From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: inted problems when upgrading to 1.6.0.4 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:14:52 +0100 Message-ID: <492BD01C.8070807@viscovery.net> References: <492BC56A.6040506@xmos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Luis Gutierrez X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 25 11:16:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L4uxo-0002F8-9G for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:16:12 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752159AbYKYKO5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:14:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752110AbYKYKO4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:14:56 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:54551 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751928AbYKYKOz (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:14:55 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L4uwX-0005Gl-1K; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:14:53 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C972369F; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:14:52 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) In-Reply-To: <492BC56A.6040506@xmos.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "lilzmailsa01.liwest.at", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Luis Gutierrez schrieb: > At my company we have been using git for the past months, and except for > a few people, everyone is happy with it. Last week, we discovered that > the mac version of git was misbehaving (v1.5.6.4), but upgrading the > client to the latest one (v1.6.0.4) fixed the issue. Fearing consistency > issue between version, I decided to update the version of the central > repository (ie, the place were people can go and synchronize their code) > on a RHEL4 box from 1.5.6.4 to 1.6.0.4. > went to my git directory, pulled, checkout v1.6.0.4, and compiled with > 'make --prefix=/usr/loca/ all' and installed with the same comamnd. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 7.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Luis Gutierrez schrieb: > At my company we have been using git for the past months, and except for > a few people, everyone is happy with it. Last week, we discovered that > the mac version of git was misbehaving (v1.5.6.4), but upgrading the > client to the latest one (v1.6.0.4) fixed the issue. Fearing consistency > issue between version, I decided to update the version of the central > repository (ie, the place were people can go and synchronize their code) > on a RHEL4 box from 1.5.6.4 to 1.6.0.4. > went to my git directory, pulled, checkout v1.6.0.4, and compiled with > 'make --prefix=/usr/loca/ all' and installed with the same comamnd. It's not necessarily the cause of your problems, but didn't make install warn you: !! You have installed git-* commands to new gitexecdir. !! Old version git-* commands still remain in bindir. !! Mixing two versions of Git will lead to problems. !! Please remove old version commands in bindir now. Did you do as you were told? -- Hannes