From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: fix description for enabling hooks Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:44:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4948ADE8.2050804@viscovery.net> References: <200812170359.24109.markus.heidelberg@web.de> <20081217041312.GZ5691@genesis.frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Markus Heidelberg , gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Vajna X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Dec 17 08:46:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LCr6f-0002Ut-Qz for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:46:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751876AbYLQHow (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:44:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751964AbYLQHov (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:44:51 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:19131 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751740AbYLQHov (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:44:51 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LCr5E-0006Lu-Nr; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:44:40 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6773854D; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:44:40 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) In-Reply-To: <20081217041312.GZ5691@genesis.frugalware.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Miklos Vajna schrieb: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:59:23AM +0100, Markus Heidelberg wrote: >> Since f98f8cb (Ship sample hooks with .sample suffix, 2008-06-24) hooks >> are not enabled by making them executable anymore, but by removing the >> '.sample' suffix from the filename. > > This is true, but having the executable bit is necessary as well. I > think it would be better to just append this requirement instead of > replacing the old one with this. Markus's proposed new wording is correct because the .sample hooks *are* already executable. -- Hannes