From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Make the rebase edit mode really end up in an edit state Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:35:43 +0100 Message-ID: <496EE74F.6000205@viscovery.net> References: <87ab9th0rh.fsf@cup.kalibalik.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anders Melchiorsen , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 15 08:37:13 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNMmt-0007VG-AK for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:37:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756659AbZAOHfs (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:35:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756546AbZAOHfr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:35:47 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:24479 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756544AbZAOHfr (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:35:47 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LNMlU-00041s-7q; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:35:44 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5124FB; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:35:43 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin schrieb: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Anders Melchiorsen wrote: >> Previously, the interactive rebase edit mode placed the user after the >> commit in question. That was awkward because a commit is supposedly >> immutable. Thus, she was forced to use "git commit --amend" for her >> changes. > > Maybe, maybe not. I frequently rebase with "edit" when I actually mean > "stop" (but "s" was taken from "squash" already). Then I test things, > possibly fixing them. > > So in that case, I do not want a git reset --soft HEAD^. Absolutely! I use "edit" for this purpose as well quite frequently. -- Hannes