From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael J Gruber Subject: Re: rebase -p confusion in 1.6.1 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:56:35 +0100 Message-ID: <496F6AC3.7050704@drmicha.warpmail.net> References: <496F3C99.1040800@drmicha.warpmail.net> <20090115135518.GB10045@leksak.fem-net> <496F44AC.2060607@drmicha.warpmail.net> <496F4BF0.6020805@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephan Beyer , Sitaram Chamarty , git@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Haberman To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 15 17:58:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNVXd-0007xg-Pf for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:58:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755169AbZAOQ4i (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:56:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755050AbZAOQ4i (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:56:38 -0500 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:35345 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753809AbZAOQ4h (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:56:37 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FA32158DC; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:56:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:56:35 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: MemKMwW+ULU+PGWxR3ewpYq8185TF0jgmO/H8bhzVlsW 1232038595 Received: from [139.174.44.34] (pascal.math.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.44.34]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4D3114A36; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:56:34 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin venit, vidit, dixit 15.01.2009 17:04: ... >>> The more I think about it, I think it's possible I broke it with the >>> introduction of the "noop". >> It certainly worked after the noop introduction before the r-i-p series, >> but not any more after. > > Umm... which rebase -i -p series do you mean? "noop" was introduced > pretty recently if my Alzheimered brain does not fool me. This one introduced noop: commit ff74126c03a8dfd04e7533573a5c420f2a7112ac Author: Johannes Schindelin Date: Fri Oct 10 13:42:12 2008 +0200 rebase -i: do not fail when there is no commit to cherry-pick This is the bad one from bisect: commit d80d6bc146232d81f1bb4bc58e5d89263fd228d4 Author: Stephen Haberman Date: Wed Oct 15 02:44:39 2008 -0500 rebase-i-p: do not include non-first-parent commits touching UPSTREAM It's the last one in a longer series. And that series is after the noop introduction. Michael