From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix gitdir detection when in subdir of gitdir
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:47:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4970BA2B.7090807@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0901161729070.3586@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure about setting an absolut path instead of a relative one
>> (hence the RFC), although I think it should not make any difference.
>> Of course I could have count the number of chdir("..") calls and then
>> construct a "../../..", but that would have been more intrusive than
>> this two-liner.
>
> IIRC the absolute paths were shot down already... for performance reasons.
>
> So we try very hard to keep relative paths instead of absolute ones.
This is a different matter.
The question is basically: How should git behave if $PWD is inside a bare
repository? And if you are inside .git/refs, than for git this looks as if
it were a bare repository.
The current behavior is that we chdir() up into .git, but do not set a
prefix. Nor do we chdir() back where we started after the discovery.
Gábor's patch needs a better justification which misbehavior it tries to
fix, and the spot that it changes:
if (is_git_directory(".")) {
inside_git_dir = 1;
if (!work_tree_env)
inside_work_tree = 0;
setenv(GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT, ".", 1);
check_repository_format_gently(nongit_ok);
return NULL;
}
needs a comment why it does what it does (and that this if-branch is only
about bare repositories).
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-16 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-16 15:37 [RFC PATCH] Fix gitdir detection when in subdir of gitdir SZEDER Gábor
2009-01-16 16:29 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-16 16:47 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2009-01-16 16:50 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-01-16 17:23 ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-01-16 18:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-16 20:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-01-18 21:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-19 2:03 ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-01-19 3:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-01-19 7:17 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-01-19 2:08 ` [PATCH] t1500: extend with tests of 'git rev-parse --git-dir' SZEDER Gábor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4970BA2B.7090807@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=szeder@ira.uka.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).