From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy White Subject: Re: Thunderbird and patches Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:55:02 -0600 Message-ID: <4990B446.2070705@codeweavers.com> References: <498E50E2.8050309@codeweavers.com> <200902072310.12764.bss@iguanasuicide.net> <498F01C2.5080105@codeweavers.com> <499022D3.3000200@drmicha.warpmail.net> <49902EDC.6020901@beonex.com> <49903521.1060101@codeweavers.com> <4990B086.10804@beonex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Michael J Gruber , "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." , git@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Bucksch X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 09 23:56:47 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LWf3J-0004MH-Tu for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:56:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752519AbZBIWzH (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:55:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752457AbZBIWzG (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:55:06 -0500 Received: from mail.codeweavers.com ([216.251.189.131]:33892 "EHLO mail.codeweavers.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752285AbZBIWzF (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:55:05 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[216.251.189.140] ident=stunnel4) by mail.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LWf1s-0001M9-9m; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:55:04 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) In-Reply-To: <4990B086.10804@beonex.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > * I strong suggest to send inline attachments (Content-Disposition: > inline, RFC 2183 [1], Internet Standard), because patches are > arguably files, and the body is for human language text. > Therefore, it's an attachment that you want to see inline, > therefore inline attachment is the IMHO correct solution. > If some mailers cannot handle this comfortably (display inline, > quote), maybe you can also advocate having *them* fixed. So, I start an email in Thunderbird, and attach test.patch to it. I don't see a way to control things, but it seems to go across as a multipart; the patch is disposition inline, type of text/x-patch. I rename it to test.txt, and now it goes across as a multipart, both parts are text/plain. I get the patch, and I can see it. Very nice. I click 'Reply', and I get no quoting in Thunderbird. (A quick check with mutt *does* show quoting.) I'm hazarding a guess that is not the expected result; am I doing it wrong? Cheers, Jeremy