From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-filter-branch: Add more error-handling Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:36:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4992F07F.2080005@viscovery.net> References: <1234361365-63711-1-git-send-email-git@randomhacks.net> <4992E79D.10208@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Kidd X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 11 16:38:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LXHA2-0001kD-Fx for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:38:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755731AbZBKPge (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:36:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755404AbZBKPgd (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:36:33 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:11162 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754870AbZBKPgd (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:36:33 -0500 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LXH8Z-0003sp-AN; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:36:31 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5C96EF; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:36:31 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) In-Reply-To: <4992E79D.10208@viscovery.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt schrieb: >> @@ -483,7 +486,7 @@ test -z "$ORIG_GIT_INDEX_FILE" || { >> } >> >> if [ "$(is_bare_repository)" = false ]; then >> - git read-tree -u -m HEAD >> + git read-tree -u -m HEAD || die "Unable to checkout rewritten tree" > > Here you shouldn't die. I take this back. I was distracted by the 'exit $ret' that is visible in the context: >> fi >> >> exit $ret But this exit statement is pointless: ret is initialized to zero and never changed. -- Hannes