From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make 'remote show' distinguish between merged and rebased remote branches Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:59:20 -0500 Message-ID: <499303E8.6030000@xiplink.com> References: <20090210202046.8EBEC3360AC@rincewind> <7v3aemm1po.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <4991FA18.1040200@xiplink.com> <76718490902101513i504e515ocb4a2d789ba520f0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de To: Jay Soffian X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 11 18:01:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LXISG-0004kW-Ag for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:00:56 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756762AbZBKQ70 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:59:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756746AbZBKQ7Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:59:25 -0500 Received: from smtp182.iad.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.245.182]:47971 "EHLO smtp182.iad.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756741AbZBKQ7Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:59:24 -0500 Received: from relay8.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A54C0208C15; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:59:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by relay8.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id 70F81207EBC; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:59:23 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: <76718490902101513i504e515ocb4a2d789ba520f0@mail.gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jay Soffian wrote: > > The output of git remote show seems much too verbose for the > information it provides. I agree. I'm happy to hammer out and implement new output for 'remote show', but is there any chance that such a change would be accepted? Junio, Dscho, (others) -- any opposition to this? > Something like this, I think, provides the > same information in much less space: > > * remote origin > URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git > Remote branches: > html Not tracked > maint Tracked > man Tracked > master Tracked > next Tracked > pu Tracked > todo Not tracked > old-next Stale (would prune) > Local branches configured to pull from this remote: > master upstream is master (merges) > wip/remote-HEAD upstream is next (rebases) How about something a bit tighter, merging the local branch list with the remote branch list: * remote origin URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git Remote branches: html Not tracked master Tracked by local branches: master (merges) mywork (rebases) next Tracked by local branch: wip/remote-HEAD (rebases) pu Tracked by local branch: pu (merges) todo Not tracked old-next Stale (would prune) ? M.