From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: send-email sending shallow threads by default Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:34:35 +0100 Message-ID: <499A769B.2080308@op5.se> References: <7vk57ridyx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090216000732.GC3503@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff King , david@lang.hm, Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Mares X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 17 09:36:14 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZLR3-00067x-Ow for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:36:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751396AbZBQIem (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:34:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751348AbZBQIel (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:34:41 -0500 Received: from mail.op5.se ([193.201.96.20]:35892 "EHLO mail.op5.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751308AbZBQIel (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:34:41 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DF424B0002; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:36:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.op5.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.op5.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BmLAFO4DZW3Q; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:36:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from clix.int.op5.se (unknown [192.168.1.20]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0956A1B8182B; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:36:33 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Martin Mares wrote: > Hello, world!\n > >> Is that the case? mutt at least orders by thread, but by rfc822 date >> within a single level of thread. So as long as the date fields (set by >> the sender) are correct, it looks right no matter what order they arrive in. > > Actually, it matters, because the Date field has limited precision > and it frequently happens that the sender produces several mails > within a single second. > There's no need to have the date field be set to the time the mails were actually sent though. AFAIR, they get the AUTHOR_DATE now, and I doubt more than one commit can be authored every second. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231