From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: Re: git rebase -i Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:12:24 -0500 Message-ID: <499D84E8.1020505@xiplink.com> References: <43d8ce650902190121v2e18aac1rfaa64a4ce6e799a3@mail.gmail.com> <7v63j6oi0d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pieter de Bie , John Tapsell , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 19 17:14:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LaBXL-0006ES-Lx for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:14:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753871AbZBSQMc (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:12:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753636AbZBSQMc (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:12:32 -0500 Received: from smtp162.iad.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.245.162]:59202 "EHLO smtp162.iad.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753171AbZBSQMb (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:12:31 -0500 Received: from relay6.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay6.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 84D057BC4DD; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:12:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by relay6.relay.iad.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id 53A197BC367; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:12:30 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: <7v63j6oi0d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I'd prefer something a bit less arbitrary, like using the tracked head >> for a tracking branch. > > I'd say that might be a very sane default for users or "branch --track" > and/or "pull --rebase", both for i-rebase and rebase. That's how I work, but even if that were the default I think I'd always specify the tracked branch head anyway. It's good to always be specific with a powerful command like rebase. M.