From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Andrei Thorp <garoth@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] git submodule: Fix handling of // and /.. in paths for added submodules
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:03:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A55DAD.2000309@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A556D5.7020806@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Michael J Gruber schrieb:
> Johannes Sixt venit, vidit, dixit 25.02.2009 15:06:
>> I think we have so far avoided \+ in sed expressions for portability reasons.
>
> Hmmpf. Is it that new, or gnu specific? I'm always afraid of portability
> issues with bash but wasn't aware of sed being an issue as well.
>
> In any case, would 's|\\*|/|g' be better (more portable) then?
You mean 's|//*|/|g'; yes, that is definitly portable.
> Well, how is
>
> echo a/b/c/../../d | sed -e ':start;s|\([^/]*\)/\.\./||g;tstart'
> a/d
>
> I meant: how portable is...
I don't know... Let's see: My AIX 4.3.3 sed understands it if it is not
all on a single line, and that says a lot. Specifically, I tried this:
echo a/b/c/../../d | sed -e ':start
s|\([^/]*\)/\.\./||
tstart
'
and got the desired result:
a/d
Note that the 'g' flag is not necessary in this case.
OTOH, this sed doesn't understand #comments :-/
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-25 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <80055d7c0902241541o5c8fad50ra4eace5919bcf6df@mail.gmail.com>
2009-02-24 23:56 ` Fwd: Git Submodule Misbehaviour With ./ Andrei Thorp
2009-02-25 11:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix git submodule add for paths with ./ Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] git submodule: Add test cases for git submodule add Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 11:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] git submodule: Fix adding of submodules at paths with ./ Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 11:21 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-02-25 12:35 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 13:04 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-02-25 13:26 ` [PATCHv2 0/4] Fix git submodule add for funky paths Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 13:26 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] git submodule: Add test cases for git submodule add Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 13:26 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] git submodule: Fix adding of submodules at paths with ./ Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 13:26 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] git submodule: Add more tests for add with funky paths Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 13:26 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] git submodule: Fix handling of // and /.. in paths for added submodules Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 14:06 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-02-25 14:33 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 15:03 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2009-02-25 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-26 9:05 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-02-26 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-03 12:39 ` [PATCHv3 0/2] git submodule: normalize paths before adding Michael J Gruber
2009-03-03 12:39 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] git submodule: Add test cases for git submodule add Michael J Gruber
2009-03-03 12:39 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] git submodule: Fix adding of submodules at paths with ./, .. and // Michael J Gruber
2009-03-03 13:08 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-03-03 14:09 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-03 15:08 ` [PATCHv4 0/2] git submodule: normalize paths before adding Michael J Gruber
2009-03-03 15:08 ` [PATCHv4 1/2] git submodule: Add test cases for git submodule add Michael J Gruber
2009-03-03 15:08 ` [PATCHv4 2/2] git submodule: Fix adding of submodules at paths with ./, .. and // Michael J Gruber
2009-03-03 15:28 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-03-03 15:39 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-03 16:32 ` [PATCHv4 0/2] git submodule: normalize paths before adding Junio C Hamano
2009-03-03 15:36 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] git submodule: Fix adding of submodules at paths with ./, .. and // Junio C Hamano
2009-03-03 15:48 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-03 14:29 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-03 14:58 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-02-25 21:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] git submodule: Fix adding of submodules at paths with ./ Junio C Hamano
2009-02-25 21:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] git submodule: Add test cases for git submodule add Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A55DAD.2000309@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=garoth@gmail.com \
--cc=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).