From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: Re: setting up tracking on push Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:26:03 -0400 Message-ID: <49B6CCDB.8010305@xiplink.com> References: <76718490903052049k217e9c12gb7881f8904fdd9d@mail.gmail.com> <49b12ff7.nCWIz4ABJcgwW3BZ%obrien654j@gmail.com> <76718490903060743m425c2d55n6e8737c893c936e8@mail.gmail.com> <87d4cuobrc.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Miles Bader X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 10 22:04:32 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lh97n-0005Q7-Lj for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:04:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753942AbZCJVDA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:03:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753899AbZCJVDA (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:03:00 -0400 Received: from iad2.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.227.212]:60203 "EHLO smtp112.iad.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753867AbZCJVC7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:02:59 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2213 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:02:59 EDT Received: from relay21.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay21.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 25D581B4042; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:26:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay21.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id 09F611B4004; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:26:04 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: <87d4cuobrc.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Miles Bader wrote: > Jay Soffian writes: >> I don't think we need a new command, but it would probably fit into >> git remote >> >> $ git remote track [] > > That seems a bit backwards -- it's more of a branch operation than a > remote operation... Agreed. We just ran into this situation today with pull: Someone wanted one of their local branches to start tracking a remote. It would be good if the branch command allowed modification of a branch's properties. At the very least, branch-creation commands like "git branch --track foobranch origin/master" could offer to modify if the branch already exists, instead of just quitting. BTW, I think the following (untested) incantation adds tracking to a branch: git config branch.foobranch.remote origin git config branch.foobranch.merge refs/heads/master (Substitute "origin" and "master" to suit your needs.) M.