From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Subject: Re: fatal: unable to write sha1 file git 1.6.2.1 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:52:15 +0100 Message-ID: <49CA0CDF.7060203@mycircuit.org> References: <49C9246E.3030508@mycircuit.org> <49C94B02.5010604@mycircuit.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 25 11:54:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LmQkE-0005SS-Vl for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:54:03 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756889AbZCYKw1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:52:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754430AbZCYKw1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:52:27 -0400 Received: from mailfe02.tele2.ch ([212.247.154.40]:50225 "EHLO swip.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756227AbZCYKw0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:52:26 -0400 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=rOj5MoUHdesA:10 a=zs1h1pAyPHAA:10 a=Qy6mu5jw0WABpOr/wumM4A==:17 a=o30em-Qy1RgtSPJGeIMA:9 a=HD890zjZ-Z4dBavPh0_axERKX2oA:4 a=M3PvEdNFSBYA:10 Received: from mail.mycircuit.org (account cxu-8g8-ypb@tele2.ch [83.180.79.156] verified) by mailfe02.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTPA id 1218467881; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:52:22 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.192] (unknown [192.168.1.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "p_email", Issuer "192.168.2.2" (verified OK)) by mail.mycircuit.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BD8D0360; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:52:19 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090302) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > > Here's an idea: if this is reproducible for you, does the behavior change > if you do > > [core] > core.fsyncobjectfiles = true > > Yes, that works ! Thanks a lot ! Peter