git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raman Gupta <rocketraman@fastmail.fm>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add feature release instructions to gitworkflows man page
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:59:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D10875.2060008@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vk567ijlf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> rocketraman@fastmail.fm writes:
> 
>> From: Raman Gupta <raman@rocketraman.com>
>>
>> Based on a mailing list discussion, add a description of the workflow,
>> and associated commands, for creating a feature release.
> 
> The same comment applies to the other one, but this commit log message is
> really lacking.  If you do not bother to summarize the discussion, place a
> pointer to the list archive, and more importantly, please describe *why*
> this change is desiable.

Ok will do.

> I am not sure rewinding and rebuilding of 'next', or even having 'next',
> is applicable for other projects as a BCP.  

Hmmm... The existing gitworkflows man page discusses the 'next' branch
several times. I am simply expanding the document to cover the branch
management associated with the git.git release process as well, which
necessarily includes a discussion of 'next'.

If you wish to remove discussion of 'next' from this document, that is
probably better done in a separate followup change. Though personally
I think its a useful concept for readers to learn about as they are
setting up their own workflows.

> Other parts (except for the "branch -f" bit I've already told you
> about in the other message) looked good.

I'll add some discussion about the branch -f bit -- I hope you agree
that in this document that is distributed with git, some
beginner-level explanation of the difference between the branch -f and
the merge approach is warranted?

Cheers,
Raman

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-30 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-30  5:35 [PATCH 1/2] Add feature release instructions to MaintNotes addendum rocketraman
2009-03-30  5:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add feature release instructions to gitworkflows man page rocketraman
2009-03-30  6:57   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30 17:59     ` Raman Gupta [this message]
2009-03-30 18:14       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30 18:40         ` Raman Gupta
2009-04-01 16:15           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30  6:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add feature release instructions to MaintNotes addendum Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30 17:57   ` Raman Gupta
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-26  1:56 rocketraman
2009-03-26  1:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add feature release instructions to gitworkflows man page rocketraman
2009-03-26  6:48   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-26 14:35     ` Raman Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49D10875.2060008@fastmail.fm \
    --to=rocketraman@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).