Re: [PATCH] Add custom memory allocator to MinGW and MacOS builds

[Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com>]

Marius Storm-Olsen said the following on 03.04.2009 15:52:
> The standard allocator on Windows is pretty bad prior
> to Windows Vista, and nedmalloc is better than the
> modified dlmalloc provided with newer versions of the
> MinGW libc.

Actually, it just struck me that it's probably the synchronization 
primitives which are better on Vista than XP, and not the memory 
manager? (Since mingw 4.3.3-tdm on XP and Vista most likely use the 
same dlmalloc fork?) ^shrug^

Anyways, not that I haven't tried to 'tune' nedmalloc in any way, just 
ensured that it compiles with the different MinGWs which I 
benchmarked. So, if anyone feels like it, maybe we can squeeze more 
performance out of it by tweaking it.

--
.marius