From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rev-list: remove last static vars used in "show_commit" Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <49DC54DC.3060408@gnu.org> References: <20090407040819.4338.4291.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20090407040854.4338.94304.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20090407040854.4338.40055.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin To: Christian Couder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 08 09:42:13 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LrSQ9-0007Ew-K8 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:42:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759445AbZDHHkH (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:40:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757775AbZDHHkH (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:40:07 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com ([209.85.220.158]:41370 "EHLO mail-fx0-f158.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752482AbZDHHkF (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 03:40:05 -0400 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so2657772fxm.37 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:40:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2M5RlvXT9Jr2aAkh4cvS80WhBhoFYOSxwPmpgU1nA/k=; b=tcPs7oLncgwSfIBXfZB0iVbvGWxiIV9GVgtJt2+txkmvh7W+MMDMO9JObhT8ocATqb NgrSzxltg39Y68405EwQ01Sfx0AYt/1lat/SxM07q/bC5Wt5e8UsnuOkQ0A3WwZI74PI mLfLiBwSaZ6jApKyhV6/iZsjRQV2DhB4X+stQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=g2Ryqi3+/xS05TBS1pKrUhDNVN3+Xo3zyrip+CWAW+4OuGIk3DZ17rmmIKUncD+IhY j4i1ffvRBRvpqN8QnKbzP/wEic1/WKCL9xDawcCbtFlDcA9Z8CtFQPgrqYxgEOvYEr+5 YkOIXw6XRm+o0QHtq8waiW0BPA7ORF8Kn4EpM= Received: by 10.86.79.19 with SMTP id c19mr848038fgb.20.1239176402718; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scientist-2.mobile.usilu.net ([195.176.179.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm9773582fga.25.2009.04.08.00.40.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:40:01 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) In-Reply-To: <20090407040854.4338.40055.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > struct rev_info revs; > + struct rev_list_info info; > int reaches = 0, all = 0; > > + memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info)); > + info.revs = &revs; Would it make sense to embed the struct rev_info entirely in the new struct, without going through a pointer? Paolo