From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
To: jean-luc malet <jeanluc.malet@gmail.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git svn : some feedback and wonder...
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:45:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A08560F.8030800@drmicha.warpmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1de9d39c0905110852v65b07bebl47cc9a58046c5288@mail.gmail.com>
jean-luc malet venit, vidit, dixit 11.05.2009 17:52:
> hi
> I'm just toying with git svn....
> so I have an svn repository and I do a git svn clone -s
> http://path.to/my/repository
> here all is fine it checkout my trunk into master branch
>
> 1) when I do a git branch -a, it show 2 branches : master and trunk,
> shouldn't it be master and svn/trunk?
No. Not unless you said --prefix=svn during clone.
> 2) when I create a branch using git svn branch it create an empty
> directory and not as expected a branch from the current revision of
> trunk
I get a branch as you expect. Can you repeat the commands which
generated an unexpected result for you?
> 3) the branch appears in git branch -a without a remote
> information.... not easy to track
See 1)
> 4) you can't do git branch --track newbranch (where new branch is the
> svn branch), since the branch name isn't prefixed by svn/ you can't
> reuse the same name
You certainly can create a local branch with the same name. I just did.
I always do. If b is that name, say
git branch --track b remotes/b
unless you have used --prefix, of course.
> 5) why having called dcommit instead of push? it would have been more
> understable (more coherent) git svn push would have pushed current
> branch on corresponding svn branch and git svn push somebranch would
> have do a git svn branch followed by the commits...
The latter would be inconsistent with git push as well.
Dcommit may be for historical reasons, but keep in mind that dcommit is
not simply pushing. It involves rebasing and a whole git-svn-git
roundtrip. It really is "do the commits" on the svn side.
> 6) why having called rebase instead of pull? git svn pull would have
> fetched svn/trackedbranch and merged into current branch, git svn pull
> somebranch would have merged into current branch the svn/somebranch
> (without traking info)
Because pull does not rebase by default, it uses merge!
Let me just add that with some more git experience, which includes
reading man pages and trying things out, there certainly will be more
insight into the why's and why not's of git-svn ;)
Cheers,
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-11 15:52 git svn : some feedback and wonder jean-luc malet
2009-05-11 16:45 ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
2009-05-11 22:11 ` MALET Jean-Luc
2009-05-12 11:52 ` jean-luc malet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A08560F.8030800@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--to=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jeanluc.malet@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).