From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferry Huberts Subject: Re: Move JGit off JSch? Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:52:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4A43E389.8060807@pelagic.nl> References: <20090625181428.GM11191@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robin Rosenberg , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 25 22:53:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MJvwX-0005Si-Fa for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:53:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753180AbZFYUw1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:52:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752978AbZFYUw1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:52:27 -0400 Received: from hupie.xs4all.nl ([82.95.241.251]:53578 "EHLO Lighthouse.internal.Hupie.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752830AbZFYUw0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:52:26 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.51] (unknown [192.168.0.51]) by Lighthouse.internal.Hupie.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652E358BDA0; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:52:25 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) In-Reply-To: <20090625181428.GM11191@spearce.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > I'm fed up with JSch. Good to know! Last year I moved our application away from j2ssh to jsch because j2ssh was pratically dead and rather oddly implemented within our application. I chose jsch because Eclipse was using it and development was actually being done on it. I wasn't aware of the issues with it though and also was not aware of MINA. I'll start looking into MINA soon because we're having some rather odd issue in our application that seem to point to problems with jsch under heavy load/many parallel connections. Your story lit up a light in my head to that effect :-) Are the Eclipse folks aware of these issues? they seem rather serious. Wouldn't it be more effective to try to improve jsch through the eclipse foundation/community, from multiple sides? (excuse me for asking the obvious) My background is in massive parallel systems so I know about the pain of implementing this kind of thing correctly (and also the reward of seeing it working...)