From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: Choosing a mergetool according to file type Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:29:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4A44B128.6040800@viscovery.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Gregory Jefferis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 26 13:30:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MK9d7-0005Qq-1m for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:30:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753960AbZFZL3x (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:29:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753869AbZFZL3w (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:29:52 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:53611 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753065AbZFZL3w (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:29:52 -0400 Received: from cpe228-254.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MK9cm-0003tm-FG; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:29:52 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B224E4; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:29:44 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Gregory Jefferis schrieb: > http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/svn/tortoisesvn/trunk/contrib/diff-scripts/ > > diff-doc.js > merge-doc.js > > Perhaps tortoisegit already exposes this. Those scripts include fallbacks > for openoffice so I suppose one could use that on linux. Thanks a lot for the pointer. The interesting one is merge-doc.js. Unfortunately, it still only just compares "their" and "our" versions, and the user must go through all marked changes and reject everything that would undo "our" changes and accept all "their" changes. That's exactly what I already do. :-( That said, the scripts are written *much* nicer than what I have written myself. -- Hannes