git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Eric Raible <raible@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Schrödinger's diff
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:28:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A52F90D.7080305@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <279b37b20907062353k34bca06erf035458e80933c8d@mail.gmail.com>

Eric Raible schrieb:
> Sometimes it does, and sometimes it doesn't (seems to be about
> 50/50).  But either way in any given repo rerunning the git-diff will
> always give the same result.
> 
> Doing an "git ls-tree HEAD" gives an identical tree in both cases.
> 
> Can anyone explain why the output to this is not deterministic?
> I'm at a complete loss.
> 
> 	# Clean up from last run and start over
> 	rm -rf .git has-crlf
> 	git init
> 	git config core.autocrlf false
> 
> 	# Add a "bad" file
> 	perl -e 'printf( "12%c%c", 0xd, 0xa )' > has-crlf
> 	git add has-crlf
> 	git commit -m"add crlf"
> 
> 	# I realize that switching is ill-advised, but I'm
> 	# trying to track down a possibly related problem...
> 	git config core.autocrlf true
> 
> 	# This sometimes produces output and sometimes it doesn't.
> 	# Either way rerunning just git-diff always gives the same result
> 	# as the first run in this repo.
> 	git diff

If I put this in a script, I get a diff in 9 out of 10 runs. If I insert
'sleep 1' right before the 'git add', I never get a diff.

I'm handing this off to people who care about core.autocrlf and who know
how racily-clean index entries (not) work ;)

-- Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-07  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-07  6:53 Schrödinger's diff Eric Raible
2009-07-07  7:28 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2009-07-07  7:52 ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-07-07 17:36 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-07-07 19:36   ` Jeff King
2009-07-07 19:48     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-07 19:54       ` Jeff King
2009-07-07 22:22         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-08  0:17           ` Eric Raible
2009-07-08  2:54             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-08  6:13               ` Eric Raible
2009-07-07 20:30       ` Eric Raible
2009-07-07 20:48         ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A52F90D.7080305@viscovery.net \
    --to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raible@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).