From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
To: Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pushing to GitHub doesn't push all branches
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:51:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A57639D.4020305@drmicha.warpmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <h37lh2$q3s$1@ger.gmane.org>
Graeme Geldenhuys venit, vidit, dixit 10.07.2009 17:07:
> Michael J Gruber wrote:
>>
>> You really mirrored your repo: All your "lost" branches are remotes on
>> the github side as well. That has two consequences:
>
> The two branches that are of most importance to me, is "trunk" and
> "fixes_2_2" as found in the SubVersion repository.
>
> refs/remotes/trunk
> refs/remotes/fixes_2_2
>
>
> So should I have only pushed the above mentioned branches, but as "true"
> heads in GitHub. Geesh, I hope I am understanding what I am typing,
> because I feel a bit lost now. :-)
>
> Is there any way to clean up the mess available on GitGub? So that 'git
> ls-remote ...' will only show the real remotes.... Or should there be no
> remotes on GitHub?
>
> Sorry, I'm fairly new to Git and it feels like I jumped into the deap
> end here. ;-)
>
>> (assuming there are only svn branches) into proper heads on github, i.e.
>> a refspec like '+refs/remotes/*:refs/*' for your pushes.
>
> I'll read the man pages on what that refspec means... If I manage to
> only push 'trunk' which is master under git and 'fixes_2_2' which will
> be some other name under git, how to I keep both those in sync with the
> SubVersion repository.
>
> At the moment I have a cronjob that executes the following every 30 minutes.
> ====================
> cd /mnt/samba/git/fpc.git/
> $GIT checkout master
> $GIT svn rebase
> $GIT gc --auto
> $GIT push origin master
> ====================
>
> Does 'git svn rebase' get all branch or does it just update "master"
> (Trunk from SubVersion)?
>
> I apologise for all the questions...
Please don't! That's what we're here for ;)
A while ago I suggested that by default, no clone (whether git or
git-svn) should have a master branch. I guess your example shows why. If
you use that repo (/mnt/samba/git/fpc.git) only for converting from svn
to git, not for doing local work, then you don't need any master branch.
But git-svn will stubbornly recreate one.
Similarly (under the same assumption), you don't need to rebase at all.
All you need is "git svn fetch", which populates the branches under
remotes/.
You can safely delete the bogus remote branches on github using
git push origin :refs/remotes/trunk
etc., i.e.
git for-each-ref --shell --format="git push -f origin :%(refname)"
refs/remotes/|while read line; do eval $line;done
(all on one line)
Then it's probably beneficial to do something like
git config remote.origin.push '+refs/remotes/*:refs/heads/*'
so that you have a nice default refspec for origin. [You may think about
renaming origin to destination, though ;) ]
Cheers,
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-10 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-10 13:24 Pushing to GitHub doesn't push all branches Graeme Geldenhuys
2009-07-10 14:45 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-07-10 14:58 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-07-10 15:07 ` Graeme Geldenhuys
2009-07-10 15:51 ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
2009-07-13 8:12 ` Graeme Geldenhuys
2009-07-13 11:01 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-07-13 13:41 ` Graeme Geldenhuys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A57639D.4020305@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--to=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=graemeg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).