From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Greg Price <price@ksplice.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix rebase -p --onto
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:38:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A601C59.8040108@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090716230031.GM7503@vinegar-pot.mit.edu>
Greg Price schrieb:
> In a rebase with --onto, the correct test for whether we can skip
> rewriting a commit is if it is already on top of $ONTO, not $UPSTREAM.
> Without --onto, this distinction does not exist and the behavior does
> not change.
>
>
> In the situation
>
> X---o---o---o---M
> \ /
> x---x---x---x
>
> Y
>
> if we try to move the branches merged at M from their base on X to be
> based on Y, so as to get
>
> X
>
> Y---o'--o'--o'--M'
> \ /
> x'--x'--x'--x'
>
> then we fail. The command `git rebase -p --onto Y X M` moves only the
> first-parent chain, like so:
>
> X
> \
> x---x---x---x
> \
> Y---o'--o'--o'--M'
>
> because it mistakenly drops the other branch(es) x---x---x---x from
> the TODO file. This tests and fixes this behavior.
I think the current behavior is by design. There is nothing to fix.
The purpose of rebase -p is to leave non-first children alone and rebase
only the first child parenthood chain. It is not the purpose to reseat an
entire history DAG.
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-17 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-16 23:00 [PATCH] Fix rebase -p --onto Greg Price
2009-07-17 6:38 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2009-07-17 8:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-17 8:40 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-07-17 8:47 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-07-17 16:48 ` Greg Price
2009-07-17 18:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-17 19:00 ` Greg Price
2009-07-17 16:33 ` Greg Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A601C59.8040108@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=price@ksplice.com \
--cc=stephen@exigencecorp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).