git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Greg Price <price@ksplice.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix rebase -p --onto
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:38:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A601C59.8040108@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090716230031.GM7503@vinegar-pot.mit.edu>

Greg Price schrieb:
> In a rebase with --onto, the correct test for whether we can skip
> rewriting a commit is if it is already on top of $ONTO, not $UPSTREAM.
> Without --onto, this distinction does not exist and the behavior does
> not change.
> 
> 
> In the situation
> 
>  X---o---o---o---M
>   \             /
>    x---x---x---x
> 
>  Y
> 
> if we try to move the branches merged at M from their base on X to be
> based on Y, so as to get
> 
>  X
> 
>  Y---o'--o'--o'--M'
>   \             /
>    x'--x'--x'--x'
> 
> then we fail.  The command `git rebase -p --onto Y X M` moves only the
> first-parent chain, like so:
> 
>  X
>   \
>    x---x---x---x
>                 \
>  Y---o'--o'--o'--M'
> 
> because it mistakenly drops the other branch(es) x---x---x---x from
> the TODO file.  This tests and fixes this behavior.

I think the current behavior is by design. There is nothing to fix.

The purpose of rebase -p is to leave non-first children alone and rebase
only the first child parenthood chain. It is not the purpose to reseat an
entire history DAG.

-- Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-17  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-16 23:00 [PATCH] Fix rebase -p --onto Greg Price
2009-07-17  6:38 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2009-07-17  8:27   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-17  8:40     ` Johannes Sixt
2009-07-17  8:47       ` Johannes Sixt
2009-07-17 16:48       ` Greg Price
2009-07-17 18:32         ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-17 19:00           ` Greg Price
2009-07-17 16:33     ` Greg Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A601C59.8040108@viscovery.net \
    --to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=price@ksplice.com \
    --cc=stephen@exigencecorp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).