git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: janitoring
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:27:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A6810EE.4030902@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248298475-2990-1-git-send-email-madcoder@debian.org>

Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
> [PATCH 2/3] refactor: use bitsizeof() instead of 8 * sizeof()
> 
>   use a macro for CHAR_BIT * sizeof(...), I tend to find it more
>   readable than 8 * sizeof(...) in the code. YMMV.
> 
> [PATCH 3/3] janitor: add DIV_ROUND_UP and use it.
> 
>   Just use linux/kernel.h DIV_ROUND_UP(a, b), it's way easier to read
>   than (a + b - 1) / (b).

Quite frankly, using these two macros means that code readers have to
learn their meaning although the original code pieces are (IMO) well-known
paradigms. Moreover, DIV_ROUND_UP hides that b is evaluated twice. I am
not enthused by these patches (though, I don't see a reason to object).

-- Hannes

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-23  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-22 21:34 janitoring Pierre Habouzit
2009-07-22 21:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] janitor: use NULL and not 0 for pointers Pierre Habouzit
2009-07-22 21:34   ` [PATCH 2/3] refactor: use bitsizeof() instead of 8 * sizeof() Pierre Habouzit
2009-07-22 21:34     ` [PATCH 3/3] janitor: add DIV_ROUND_UP and use it Pierre Habouzit
2009-07-23  5:07     ` [PATCH 2/3] refactor: use bitsizeof() instead of 8 * sizeof() Jeff King
2009-07-23  5:09       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23  5:11         ` Jeff King
2009-07-23  5:15           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-07-23  6:22         ` Pierre Habouzit
2009-07-22 22:00 ` janitoring Junio C Hamano
2009-07-22 22:02   ` janitoring Pierre Habouzit
2009-07-22 22:19     ` janitoring Junio C Hamano
2009-07-22 22:29   ` janitoring Johannes Schindelin
2009-07-23  7:27 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A6810EE.4030902@viscovery.net \
    --to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=madcoder@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).