From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J.H." Subject: Re: Add Gitweb support for LZMA compressed snapshots Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:44:28 -0700 Message-ID: <4A714F5C.70000@eaglescrag.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Mark A Rada X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 30 10:42:43 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MWRDV-0004MD-Bc for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:42:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751266AbZG3ImR (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:42:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751245AbZG3ImR (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:42:17 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:50199 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218AbZG3ImR (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:42:17 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 3463 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:42:16 EDT Received: from voot-cruiser.eaglescrag.net (c-71-202-189-206.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.202.189.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by shards.monkeyblade.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n6U7iSNe009380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:44:28 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/9634/Wed Jul 29 20:03:31 2009 on shards.monkeyblade.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.1.1 (shards.monkeyblade.net [198.137.202.13]); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Mark A Rada wrote: > Hi, > > I thought I would submit this little patch I made to my gitweb. I am on > a relatively slow > connection, and so LZMA compression time is less of a concern than > bandwidth---I'm > guessing that I am not the only person who suffers from slow internet > connection > syndrome. > > > -- > Mark A Rada (ferrous26) > marada@uwaterloo.ca Don't use 'lzma' the command, use 'xz' ( http://tukaani.org/xz/ ) as it uses the lzma2 format which is, by far, preferable to what 'lzma' outputs. Same compression (lzma) just different file format. - John 'Warthog9' Hawley