From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: bug with .git file and aliases Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:26:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4A81474C.70804@viscovery.net> References: <7f9d599f0907200654q2e068e6aq3051c122f6596053@mail.gmail.com> <20090720152117.GB5347@coredump.intra.peff.net> <4A814216.20708@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff King , Geoffrey Irving , git@vger.kernel.org, Lars Hjemli , Johannes Schindelin To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 11 14:52:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Maqpi-0007FV-Dx for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:52:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754144AbZHKMsS (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:48:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754399AbZHKMsR (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:48:17 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:34633 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753232AbZHKMsN (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:48:13 -0400 Received: from cpe228-254.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MaoYf-0005mv-Bb; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:26:21 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E8D795; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:26:20 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <4A814216.20708@drmicha.warpmail.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael J Gruber schrieb: > ...because it was up to the brave git-on-win folks to decide whether > setenv() on win would be rewritten to not use putenv() when the value is > "". J&J, has anything happened on the front or is it likely to? (I'm > sorry I can't offer help, only moral support...) Nothing has changed since. Nothing is likely to happen until there is a need to touch compat/setenv.c, like, for example, a test in the test suite that fails only on Windows... -- Hannes