From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: sparse support in pu Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:00:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4A894676.1090803@viscovery.net> References: <2729632a0908162309ma6e7d41kc3bafe4575120630@mail.gmail.com> <2729632a0908170149o425544dcw52aeb6ac6ee1437d@mail.gmail.com> <4A8932BB.7030002@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: skillzero@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 17 14:01:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Md0tg-000585-N9 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:01:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932179AbZHQMA7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:00:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757869AbZHQMA7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:00:59 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:56489 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751313AbZHQMA6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:00:58 -0400 Received: from cpe228-254.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Md0tV-0006gp-D9; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:00:57 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009ECC6C2; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:00:54 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy schrieb: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> In order to advocate my earlier proposal: Name the file >> .git/info/phantoms, then it's clear: "The files mentioned here are >> phantoms" - they exist in the index, but not in the worktree; no phantoms >> means that everything is checked out. > > OK. Phantom checkout, must be unique in VCS world ;-) If no one > objects my next series will use this name as it's better than "sparse" > and "assume-unchanged" is just too vague. Would option names to > enable/disable this be --with[out]-phantoms? --phantoms vs. --no-phantoms? -- Hannes