git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: "Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz" <arekm@maven.pl>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: is smarter bisect possible?
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:59:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ABC7865.7010705@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <h9hrv3$cao$1@ger.gmane.org>

Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz schrieb:
> I have such problem. Linus kernel tree merged some feature 
> (94e0fb086fc5663c38bbc0fe86d698be8314f82f) that was developed in .31rc9 era.
> 
> Current Linus kernel tree with that feature merged shows some regression. 
> Tree just before that merge doesn't show regression.
> 
> Now if I start to bisect just that feature (good 
> b7f21bb2e23b4fec16b448a34889f467465be659, bad 
> 94e0fb086fc5663c38bbc0fe86d698be8314f82f) then git gets me whole tree back 
> to .31rc9 era which... doesn't show any problems.
> 
> This means that only combined current Linus tree and that feature shows a 
> problem.

Try this:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#bisect-merges

-- Hannes

      reply	other threads:[~2009-09-25  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-25  9:37 is smarter bisect possible? Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2009-09-25  7:59 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ABC7865.7010705@viscovery.net \
    --to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    --cc=arekm@maven.pl \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).