From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: Compact view of history in gitk Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:07:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4AC1F88E.7080802@viscovery.net> References: <4AC1F435.4030802@ubicom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Yakup Akbay X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 29 14:07:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MsbUm-0001wA-AU for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:07:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753909AbZI2MHn (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:07:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753890AbZI2MHn (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:07:43 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:17632 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753737AbZI2MHm (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:07:42 -0400 Received: from cpe228-254.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MsbUd-0007je-5z; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:07:43 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CFBBC81; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:07:42 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <4AC1F435.4030802@ubicom.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Yakup Akbay schrieb: > Think of the gitk version of the history below: > > E-*-*-*-F > / > A-*-*-*-*-*-*-B-C-*-*-*-D > \ > G-*-*-H-*-*-*-I > \ > J-*-*-*-*-*-K > > > I want an output like this: > > E-~-F > / > A-~-B-C-~-D > \ > G-~-H-~-I > \ > J-~-K > > Is there an option in gitk (or in any other tool) to get such a view? I think, --simplify-by-decoration comes close, even though it may not be 100% what you describe. -- Hannes