From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nasser Grainawi Subject: git-pack-objects gitattributes? Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:00:08 -0600 Organization: Code Aurora Forum Message-ID: <4AD3B4F8.6030007@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 13 01:07:02 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MxTyg-0003VN-V0 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:06:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932750AbZJLXAq (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:00:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932634AbZJLXAq (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:00:46 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:57075 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932603AbZJLXAp (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:00:45 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5769"; a="25100087" Received: from pdmz-ns-mip.qualcomm.com (HELO mostmsg01.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.10]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 12 Oct 2009 16:00:08 -0700 Received: from [129.46.10.111] (pdmz-snip-v218.qualcomm.com [192.168.218.1]) by mostmsg01.qualcomm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0877810004B1 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:03:15 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hello, I'm trying to avoid doing delta compression on a number of large binary files. I got a suggestion to use $GIT_DIR/info/attributes and a line like this: *.bin -delta This doesn't seem to show a big improvement (and honestly I can't find where in the git-pack-objects source the value of this attribute is used). Could someone shed some light on this attribute and any other improvements I could make for efficiently serving up a repo over git-daemon with near-weekly revisions of 100MB+ files? Thanks, Nasser