git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
To: Erick Mattos <erick.mattos@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Changed timestamp behavior of options -c/-C/--amend
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:56:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEB6104.3080005@kdbg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256931394-9338-1-git-send-email-erick.mattos@gmail.com>

Erick Mattos schrieb:
> @@ -61,13 +62,16 @@ OPTIONS
>  -C <commit>::
>  --reuse-message=<commit>::
>  	Take an existing commit object, and reuse the log message
> -	and the authorship information (including the timestamp)
> -	when creating the commit.
> +	and the authorship information when creating the commit.
> +	By default, timestamp is taken from specified commit unless
> +	option --new-timestamp is included.
>  
>  -c <commit>::
>  --reedit-message=<commit>::
>  	Like '-C', but with '-c' the editor is invoked, so that
>  	the user can further edit the commit message.
> +	By default, timestamp is recalculated and not taken from
> +	specified commit unless option --old-timestamp is included.
>  
>  -F <file>::
>  --file=<file>::
> @@ -134,6 +138,8 @@ OPTIONS
>  	current tip -- if it was a merge, it will have the parents of
>  	the current tip as parents -- so the current top commit is
>  	discarded.
> +	By default, timestamp is taken from latest commit unless option
> +	--new-timestamp is included.

I don't like this a lot. Currently, we consistently (and predictably!) 
reuse the timestamp when the author information is reused. Therefore, I 
think it should be sufficient to introduce only --new-timestamp.

-- Hannes

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-30 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-30 19:36 [PATCH] Changed timestamp behavior of options -c/-C/--amend Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 20:26 ` Jeff King
2009-10-30 21:22   ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 21:51   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 22:10   ` Johannes Sixt
2009-10-31 23:34   ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-10-30 21:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 21:58   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 22:20     ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 22:33       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 23:12         ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-31  0:10           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-31  1:42             ` Erick Mattos
     [not found]   ` <55bacdd30910301505xe712b74m837dc862a6ee953@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-30 22:13     ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 22:26       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-10-30 22:30         ` Erick Mattos
2009-10-30 21:56 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AEB6104.3080005@kdbg.org \
    --to=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=erick.mattos@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).