From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2009, #01; Wed, 04) Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:38:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4AF28F1F.7020905@viscovery.net> References: <7vmy31a5p6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ramsay Jones To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 05 09:39:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N5xs1-0005k5-Ms for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:39:06 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751147AbZKEIiy (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:38:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751003AbZKEIiy (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:38:54 -0500 Received: from lilzmailmt02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.12]:15876 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750865AbZKEIix (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 03:38:53 -0500 Received: from cpe228-254.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N5xrr-0003g2-Iw; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:38:55 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5B24E9; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:38:55 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <7vmy31a5p6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano schrieb: > * rj/maint-simplify-cygwin-makefile (2009-10-27) 1 commit. > - Makefile: merge two Cygwin configuration sections into one > > This is one of the most obviously correct bit from "Compiling on Cygwin > using MSVC fails" topic I didn't really look at. If J6t is Ok with the > series, I don't mind queueing the whole thing myself. I'm actually expecting a resend of the remaining patches in the series with updated commit messages and with the original patch 3/4 being first. -- Hannes