From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abdelrazak Younes Subject: Re: [QGIT PATCH/RFC] Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:15:37 +0100 Organization: LyX Message-ID: <4AF3DB29.6010908@lyx.org> References: <4AF19630.2070402@lyx.org> <4AF2A538.7040303@lyx.org> <4AF2A69F.1090802@lyx.org> <4AF2AAFD.9000309@lyx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Marco Costalba X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 06 09:15:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N6Jz3-0003OU-PC for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:15:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753518AbZKFIPh (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:15:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751873AbZKFIPg (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:15:36 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com ([209.85.219.207]:35553 "EHLO mail-ew0-f207.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751476AbZKFIPg (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:15:36 -0500 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so805461ewy.37 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:15:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.0.216 with SMTP id 24mr485815ebc.10.1257495340414; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:15:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.216? ([62.161.104.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm5842640eyf.7.2009.11.06.00.15.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:15:39 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Marco Costalba wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 21:25, Marco Costalba wrote: > >> When I tested I _found_ a speed difference, but now I don't remember >> of how much. Be sure you have warm cache when doing the test (press >> F5) for few times to be sure all is in RAM. >> >> > > Sorry, I forgot. Be sure also our custom hashing function is actually > called in your binary and the compiler didn't linked the Qt one > instead :-) > Yes I made sure of that (see my other mail). Abdel.