From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abdelrazak Younes Subject: Re: [QGIT PATCH/RFC] Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:16:31 +0100 Organization: LyX Message-ID: <4AF3DB5F.3030704@lyx.org> References: <4AF19630.2070402@lyx.org> <4AF2A538.7040303@lyx.org> <4AF2A69F.1090802@lyx.org> <4AF2AAFD.9000309@lyx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Marco Costalba X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 06 09:16:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N6Jzs-0003jm-Uj for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:16:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753942AbZKFIQa (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:16:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753651AbZKFIQ3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:16:29 -0500 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.24]:44510 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751873AbZKFIQ3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:16:29 -0500 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 25so205291eya.19 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:16:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.23.84 with SMTP id q20mr446359ebb.55.1257495393260; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:16:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.4.216? ([62.161.104.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm5844207eyf.7.2009.11.06.00.16.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:16:32 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Marco Costalba wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:37, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >> I recompiled qgit with the Qt version and I didn't notice any performance >> problem with a big repo (Qt). >> >> > > In git we don't need to compute hashes of sha strings because they are > already hashed ! > Now you tell it, it's obvious indeed :-) Thanks, Abdel.