From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raman Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] Add branch management for releases to gitworkflows Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:27:30 -0500 Message-ID: <4AFEE882.4030208@fastmail.fm> References: <1258055164-11876-1-git-send-email-rocketraman@fastmail.fm> <1258055164-11876-2-git-send-email-rocketraman@fastmail.fm> <20091114071946.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <4AFDE421.5050307@fastmail.fm> <20091114081040.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <4AFE41AF.8050802@fastmail.fm> <20091114180123.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, trast@student.ethz.ch, gitster@pobox.com To: Nanako Shiraishi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 14 18:27:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N9MPY-0004n5-3T for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:27:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755604AbZKNR1c (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:27:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755596AbZKNR1c (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:27:32 -0500 Received: from smtp126.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.53.31]:48967 "HELO smtp126.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755582AbZKNR1c (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:27:32 -0500 Received: (qmail 20773 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2009 17:27:37 -0000 Received: from CPE000db9166236-CM00186845d2ae.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (rocketraman@99.224.155.40 with login) by smtp126.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2009 09:27:37 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: 5CKRlKeswBAtrcX.EVB04BFKSgZiN0yKOK0iylIm064Zdzo- X-YMail-OSG: 5bBeXS0VM1kH5gXyJNLvzzA.pi7n9EE1CMV5rU9o.Uq7AK8I9OBE.GO_qKfqpmAAeA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apollo.rocketraman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34B521C05CC; Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:27:36 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rocketraman.com Received: from apollo.rocketraman.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (apollo.rocketraman.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K8PWag2vmhEn; Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:27:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (zeus.rocketraman.com [192.168.1.5]) by apollo.rocketraman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFD421C05CB; Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:27:30 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825) In-Reply-To: <20091114180123.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nanako Shiraishi wrote: > Quoting Raman Gupta > >> Ok, another dumb question: since you have now submitted a patch on top >> of my patch, what is the proper etiquette for proceeding? Who >> maintains this patch series until it is committed? Since your patch >> applies on top of mine I can't really make any more changes without >> affecting your patch right? I can't find any guidance in the >> SubmittingPatches document. > > What usually happens is that we wait now. > > In this case we are in agreement that it is a good idea to apply > both of our patches (mine was only repeating what Junio said in > his comments), so if I were you, I would anticipate that Junio > would apply both of them and start preparing incremental updates > on top of them now, and send them when the patches appear in his > 'pu' branch. > > Junio has gone quiet for the past few days; maybe he is too busy > to read or respond to either of our patch. Instead of preparing > the final text you write in the document in a patch format, it > may be a better to bring up your ideas here and discuss them > first. What changes do you have in mind? I think the new section > now already is in a reasonable shape. No specific changes -- it was a hypothetical question... Cheers, Raman