From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] grep: --full-tree
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:07:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0DB894.7010800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091125225318.GA10127@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:41:33PM -0500, A Large Angry SCM wrote:
>
>>> I agree with all of this as far as changing the default goes. But the
>>> point of my earlier messages was that I don't think there _is_ one sane
>>> default. I really do want it different per-project. And that means a
>>> configuration option.
>> Since grep is so useful, both interactively and scripted, outside of
>> git, this is a pretty convincing argument that git-grep, and all
>> other git commands with configurable behavior or defaults that change
>> over time, need a both a scripting form and an interactive form.
>
> It is tempting to have scripts simply set a GIT_VANILLA environment
> variable to ignore config options. But I think it is not quite so
> simple. As a script, if I am calling "git log", do I want it to respect
> the user's colorization config or not? It depends on _how_ I am calling
> it. Is the output to be shown to the user, or am I going to process it
> myself?
>
> Similarly, why is the script calling "git grep"? If it is because the
> script is a convenience wrapper (e.g., let's say to colorize the output
> in a particular way), then it probably wants to respect my configured
> choice of which files to grep. But if the script is just using "git
> grep" to get data to perform some other calculation, then it probably
> does care deeply about which set of files to grep.
>
> So I think you have situations where scripts do want to invoke the
> porcelain version of a command versus the plumbing. But much harder, you
> have ones where they want to respect some options but not others.
<semi rhetorical>
So, what's the solution?
Have every command command take a list of configuration options to
ignore/respect?
Have every command take an option to ignore/respect _all_ configuration
options?
Have inconsistency between commands, like we have now
Have commands have all kinds of hidden/undocumented default settings?
</semi rhetorical>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-25 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-24 8:56 [PATCH] grep: --full-tree Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 13:16 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-11-25 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 14:56 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-25 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 20:19 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-25 20:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 20:46 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-25 23:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-25 23:29 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-25 20:52 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 20:39 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 21:00 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 21:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 21:49 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 22:12 ` James Pickens
2009-11-25 22:20 ` Jeff King
2009-11-26 17:56 ` James Pickens
2009-11-27 6:20 ` Jeff King
2009-11-27 8:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 9:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-27 9:59 ` Jeff King
2009-11-27 10:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-27 16:27 ` Uri Okrent
2009-11-27 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 18:47 ` Uri Okrent
2009-11-27 20:53 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 19:50 ` Uri Okrent
2009-11-29 11:48 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-11-27 18:02 ` Jeff King
2009-11-27 20:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-27 21:05 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 10:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-29 18:32 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-29 12:13 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-11-27 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 20:50 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 10:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-29 18:24 ` Jeff King
2009-11-27 10:37 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-11-27 10:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-25 22:26 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2009-11-26 0:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 0:16 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-26 0:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 0:30 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-26 0:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 18:14 ` James Pickens
2009-11-25 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 22:26 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 22:41 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-25 22:53 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 23:07 ` A Large Angry SCM [this message]
2009-11-25 23:22 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 11:38 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-11-29 19:45 ` Uri Okrent
2009-11-26 0:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 6:22 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 22:15 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-25 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 22:31 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-25 22:43 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-25 23:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-25 23:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 0:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-26 0:13 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0DB894.7010800@gmail.com \
--to=gitzilla@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).