From: Uri Okrent <uokrent@gmail.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] grep: --full-tree
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:45:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B12CF63.3040400@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94a0d4530911290338h459dd5a2p4752f7d58c455964@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>> Probably we would want something flexible, but with sane defaults. Like
>> an environment variable to ignore all (or most) config options, but then
>> the ability to opt into specific ones. Something like:
>>
>> GIT_PLUMBING=1; export GIT_PLUMBING
>> git log ;# does not respect any non-plumbing config
>> git --respect='log.showroot' ;# respect just the one variable
>> git --respect='color.*' log ;# you get all color
>>
>> But there are two big obstacles (besides the obvious issue that
>> introducing this in itself needs a gentle transition plan):
>>
>> 1. We need to annotate every config option with whether it is
>> potentially problematic. For example, core.filemode should probably
>> be respected no matter what (but I'm not sure if it is simply true
>> for core.*).
>>
>> 2. Script writers need to actually use the system, which is somewhat
>> more verbose and annoying than what they have to do now. But at
>> least it defaults to safety when they are lazy, and then they can
>> re-add options. Of course, they are stuck on an upgrade treadmill
>> of analyzing and approving each new option that appears in git.
>
> +1 on this.
>
> This would make it easier to add options in the future that would be
> potentially dangerous to scripts otherwise. But more than
> "non-plumbing" I would rather define these variables as *preferences*;
> things that are not essential to the proper functioning of git
> commands, and would vary from user to user.
>
Sounds like a good idea to me, speaking as someone who has git support
scripts. Dealing with configuration soup in every script would be very
bad.
The same type of insulation though could probably be achieved by not
adding configuration options that alter the behavior of commands,
and instead have user's rely on aliases for that purpose. (The cat's
probably already out of the bag WRT to configuration though).
--
Uri
Please consider the environment before printing this message.
http://www.panda.org/how_you_can_help/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-29 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-24 8:56 [PATCH] grep: --full-tree Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 13:16 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-11-25 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 14:56 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-25 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 20:19 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-25 20:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 20:46 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-25 23:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-25 23:29 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-11-25 20:52 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 20:39 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 21:00 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 21:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 21:49 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 22:12 ` James Pickens
2009-11-25 22:20 ` Jeff King
2009-11-26 17:56 ` James Pickens
2009-11-27 6:20 ` Jeff King
2009-11-27 8:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 9:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-27 9:59 ` Jeff King
2009-11-27 10:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-27 16:27 ` Uri Okrent
2009-11-27 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 18:47 ` Uri Okrent
2009-11-27 20:53 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 19:50 ` Uri Okrent
2009-11-29 11:48 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-11-27 18:02 ` Jeff King
2009-11-27 20:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-27 21:05 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 10:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-29 18:32 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-29 12:13 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-11-27 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 20:50 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 10:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-29 18:24 ` Jeff King
2009-11-27 10:37 ` Matthieu Moy
2009-11-27 10:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-25 22:26 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2009-11-26 0:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 0:16 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-26 0:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 0:30 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-26 0:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 18:14 ` James Pickens
2009-11-25 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 22:26 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 22:41 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-25 22:53 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 23:07 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-25 23:22 ` Jeff King
2009-11-29 11:38 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-11-29 19:45 ` Uri Okrent [this message]
2009-11-26 0:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-27 6:22 ` Jeff King
2009-11-25 22:15 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-25 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 22:31 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-25 22:43 ` A Large Angry SCM
2009-11-25 23:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-25 23:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-26 0:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-26 0:13 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B12CF63.3040400@gmail.com \
--to=uokrent@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=gitzilla@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).