From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] rebase -i: Change function make_squash_message into update_squash_message Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:20:10 +0100 Message-ID: <4B4ED3BA.5080805@viscovery.net> References: <784d63d686a82b93a29531d3079aadbe83258d9f.1263447038.git.mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de To: Michael Haggerty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 14 09:20:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVKwH-0006PZ-Ps for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:20:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756483Ab0ANIUQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:20:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756447Ab0ANIUP (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:20:15 -0500 Received: from lilzmailso01.liwest.at ([212.33.55.23]:15005 "EHLO lilzmailso01.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754949Ab0ANIUO (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:20:14 -0500 Received: from cpe228-254.liwest.at ([81.10.228.254] helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by lilzmailso01.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVKw7-0003N6-34; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:20:11 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A061660F; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:20:10 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <784d63d686a82b93a29531d3079aadbe83258d9f.1263447038.git.mhagger@alum.mit.edu> X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael Haggerty schrieb: > Alter the file $SQUASH_MSG in place rather than outputting the new > message then juggling it around. Change the function name > accordingly. Code churn... Oh...wait... (You get the point ;) -- Hannes