From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 5/6] revert: add --ff option to allow fast forward when cherry-picking
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:56:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B67DAA9.4050709@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002020613.48067.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
>> and that even without
>> setting the variables, "git cherry-pick" will pick a new commit date but
>> "git cherry-pick --ff" wouldn't. The latter, I think is the only
>> difference that is worth pondering further.
>
> Because --no-ff could be used when the GIT_COMMITTER_* and GIT_AUTHOR_* env
> variable should be respected? Or because we should check if one of these
> env variable is set and, if that is the case, we should not fast forward?
I wish it could be the former, at least in the long run; after all git
merge fast-forwards by default, and it doesn't adjust its behavior if
GIT_COMMITTER_* is passed.
Anyway, your plan of starting with --ff and changing the default to
--no-ff later seems fine. Maybe you can add --no-ff now already, though
it would be a no-op.
>> Note that "-e --ff" would error out; however if --ff would be the
>> default, "-e" would probably choose between fast-forward and
>> non-fast-forward depending on whether the commit message was edited.
>
> Yeah, but let's change the default later please.
Sure.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-02 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 7:55 [RFC/PATCH 0/6] add --ff option to cherry-pick Christian Couder
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/6] revert: libify cherry-pick and revert functionnality Christian Couder
2010-02-01 10:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-03 16:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/6] reset: refactor updating heads into a static function Christian Couder
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/6] reset: refactor reseting in its own function Christian Couder
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/6] reset: make reset function non static and declare it in "reset.h" Christian Couder
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/6] revert: add --ff option to allow fast forward when cherry-picking Christian Couder
2010-02-01 11:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-01 12:43 ` Christian Couder
2010-02-01 14:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-02 5:13 ` Christian Couder
2010-02-02 7:56 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/6] rebase -i: use new --ff cherry-pick option Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B67DAA9.4050709@gnu.org \
--to=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=s-beyer@gmx.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).