From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Completion of error handling Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:49:16 +0100 Message-ID: <4B6873AC.4030303@web.de> References: <4B68249F.6070004@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 02 19:55:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcNuL-00075V-H5 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:55:29 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756866Ab0BBSzX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:55:23 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:52816 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756360Ab0BBSzX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:55:23 -0500 Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B177D145FC00E; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:55:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [78.49.150.133] (helo=[192.168.1.202]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1NcNoM-0001en-00; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:49:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > What is the likelihood for those function calls to actually fail? Do you know the probability for failed memory allocations? Would you like to care for error codes from all Pthread function calls? Regards, Markus