From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Completion of error handling Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:55:03 +0100 Message-ID: <4B689F37.1030701@web.de> References: <4B68249F.6070004@web.de> <4B6873AC.4030303@web.de> <4B688042.8090400@web.de> <32541b131002021149g6ffe703erd9e25621e4305a52@mail.gmail.com> <4B6886CE.9040602@web.de> <32541b131002021225k19ef94b2me8ef40cd502b85d@mail.gmail.com> <4B68989D.80906@web.de> <32541b131002021327u29e666b8ia5c6aab25fb55688@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nicolas Pitre , git@vger.kernel.org To: Avery Pennarun X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 02 22:55:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcQiJ-00018Q-Rs for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:55:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756760Ab0BBVzJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:55:09 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:34093 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755435Ab0BBVzH (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:55:07 -0500 Received: from smtp07.web.de (fmsmtp07.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.215]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64511145FD9A4; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:55:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [78.49.150.133] (helo=[192.168.1.202]) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1NcQiA-0004lE-00; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:55:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <32541b131002021327u29e666b8ia5c6aab25fb55688@mail.gmail.com> X-Sender: Markus.Elfring@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19eDdhwtkFu6BO3pPfOTCBKFJCSLg05+etkietD 7CevOX9SgHk9RsZcyU1GG2DR6zRUrDlSzfyCnUndck0fIgSJ6C aqMQ7dsFP4BpbgoKahuA== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > > If you never notice, then that's a good thing, right? :) > Well, this depends on the kind of potential damage that will come from the ignorance of function return values. It might hurt more when corresponding effects can not be ignorable any more because they became so obvious. Regards, Markus