From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:20:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4B71B574.3010609@web.de> References: <4B67227A.7030908@web.de> <7vhbq0wuy6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 09 20:20:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NevdU-0000t5-J8 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:20:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751944Ab0BITUZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:20:25 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:48714 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751651Ab0BITUZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 14:20:25 -0500 Received: from smtp06.web.de (fmsmtp06.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.172]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5976D14D6E107; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:20:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [78.48.143.95] (helo=[192.168.1.202]) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1NevdF-00088d-00; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:20:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <7vhbq0wuy6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Sender: Markus.Elfring@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19POWbQenmog1JJ4tdK4pxTVSdkqDSd6fxEw/CJ 2LaqWVsAL5PKfC7VZGs5ZEFvRbR05cuPj8FhE8BW3AWvjiiSLI 0nQfgGapmQ9j47Xn1VVA== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > > We _can_ start experimenting with an option (similar to "checkout -m"), > which does: > Does the documentation need any improvements on the dependencies between the mentioned subfunctions? Would we like to collect further ideas on the suggested issue? Regards, Markus