From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] git-gui: =?UTF-8?B?RG9u4oCZdCB0cmlnZ2VyIGdhcg==?= =?UTF-8?B?YmFnZSBjb2xsZWN0aW9uIHdhcm5pbmcgc28gZWFzaWx5?= Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:40:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4B7DA5D7.20704@kdbg.org> References: <20100218143431.GA30486@progeny.tock> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Shawn O. Pearce" , Mark Brown To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 18 21:41:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiDBR-0007aS-Eg for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:41:13 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754861Ab0BRUlI (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:41:08 -0500 Received: from bsmtp4.bon.at ([195.3.86.186]:23259 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751874Ab0BRUlH (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:41:07 -0500 Received: from [77.119.103.8] (77.119.103.8.wireless.dyn.drei.com [77.119.103.8]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CBBCDF82; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:40:59 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <20100218143431.GA30486@progeny.tock> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonathan Nieder schrieb: > This series does the simplest thing I could figure out how to > implement: it builds in the heuristic for counting loose objects from > builtin-gc.c into git-gui (so it will respect the gc.auto > configuration and by default will trigger much less often) and if that > heuristic is satisfied, runs gc --auto. Any improvement in this respect is appreciated. Minor nit: By all means while you are in this area, please do not carry over this silly "your repository has *approximately* 576 objects" message (highlight is mine). "576" is not approximate. "500" is approximate, "750" is, too, but "1024" etc. is not. ;-) -- Hannes