From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:33:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B898F97.90706@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhbq0wuy6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
> If you are starting from "if your work tree is dirty, you MUST stash
> before checking out another branch", the suggestion is understandable.
> But the thing is, that starting point is not quite correct.
Does an option exist for the command "git checkout" to return to the specified
branch without modifications in one step?
When will it not be needed to reset the work tree to the last corresponding commit?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-27 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 18:50 Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing Markus Elfring
2010-02-01 20:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-01 21:57 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-01 22:44 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-02 1:36 ` Petr Baudis
2010-02-02 10:26 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-02 11:04 ` Petr Baudis
2010-02-09 19:20 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-09 20:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-09 21:01 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-18 17:43 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-18 20:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-27 21:33 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2010-02-27 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-28 13:55 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-28 22:57 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-01 10:50 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-01 17:02 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-01 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-01 18:14 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-01 18:29 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-01 19:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-01 21:20 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-02 1:41 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-02 9:35 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-02 17:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-03 15:55 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-04 7:46 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-04 19:55 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-02 9:45 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-02 18:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-03 16:00 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-17 16:35 ` [PATCH] Clarification for the command "git checkout <branch>" Markus Elfring
2010-03-17 16:44 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-03-17 17:00 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-17 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-17 18:21 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-17 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-17 18:50 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-17 19:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-18 10:11 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-18 16:36 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-03-18 17:19 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 17:33 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-03-19 8:28 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-19 17:17 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-03-20 6:00 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-19 8:15 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-30 15:57 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-30 22:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-31 3:58 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2010-04-01 4:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-01 13:09 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2010-04-01 6:38 ` Markus Elfring
2010-04-10 13:30 ` Markus Elfring
2010-04-10 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B898F97.90706@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).