From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:29:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4B8C0785.30505@web.de> References: <4B67227A.7030908@web.de> <7vhbq0wuy6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4B898F97.90706@web.de> <7vr5o6s5xf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4B8B9BF1.10408@web.de> <7v1vg4ufas.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4b8c0420.5544f10a.2eb2.ffffb4c4@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Witten X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 01 19:33:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmAQt-0001Bk-KF for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:33:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753361Ab0CASc4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:32:56 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:39594 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753353Ab0CAScy (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:32:54 -0500 Received: from smtp06.web.de (fmsmtp06.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.172]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9837C150E565B; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:32:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [78.48.194.16] (helo=[192.168.1.202]) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1NmAMx-0005cT-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:29:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <4b8c0420.5544f10a.2eb2.ffffb4c4@mx.google.com> X-Provags-ID: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Markus Elfring's goal (I think) is to associate local modifications with > a particular branch, *not* carry them across branches; that is, the goal > is to stash local modifications away when we leave a branch and only pop > them off the stash when we RETURN to that same branch. You are right. - I am especially interested in this use case. I would like to stress the relationships of files for a specific software development task Regards, Markus