From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:45:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4B8CDE20.8030600@web.de> References: <4B67227A.7030908@web.de> <7vhbq0wuy6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4B898F97.90706@web.de> <7vr5o6s5xf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4B8B9BF1.10408@web.de> <7v1vg4ufas.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4b8c0420.5544f10a.2eb2.ffffb4c4@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Witten X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 02 10:47:53 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmOhg-00076j-1p for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:47:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752199Ab0CBJrl (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 04:47:41 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:54251 "EHLO fmmailgate03.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751966Ab0CBJrk (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 04:47:40 -0500 Received: from smtp08.web.de (fmsmtp08.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.216]) by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C362E1414D49C; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:45:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [78.54.163.252] (helo=[192.168.1.202]) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1NmOf1-0001Zd-00; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:45:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <4b8c0420.5544f10a.2eb2.ffffb4c4@mx.google.com> X-Sender: Markus.Elfring@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19PgqXVQXnNlsjsWomP67vywMfN2fByfDKnv90f vfmqkl7HFxXa+yX0v6GdzWdH975cbVA5Nir1Dxm7CHv6tY/Eay ZGbS0I1zjZettnneAHfw== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > You've still got the wrong problem in your head (though you're > solving a more useful issue). Which idea would be better? Regards, Markus