From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:55:18 +0100 Message-ID: <4B901026.4090002@web.de> References: <4B67227A.7030908@web.de> <4B8B9BF1.10408@web.de> <7v1vg4ufas.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4b8c0420.5544f10a.2eb2.ffffb4c4@mx.google.com> <7vk4tvsu6x.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4B8C2F90.8080104@web.de> <4B8CDBCA.4030101@web.de> <7vvdde62ai.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4B8E8677.8060003@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Witten X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 04 22:00:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NnH8t-0007mN-Dj for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:55:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756251Ab0CDTz0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:55:26 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:48641 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756245Ab0CDTzZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:55:25 -0500 Received: from smtp08.web.de (fmsmtp08.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.216]) by fmmailgate02.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391EA151ED9AF; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 20:55:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [78.49.172.30] (helo=[192.168.1.202]) by smtp08.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1NnH8m-0005pj-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:55:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: X-Sender: Markus.Elfring@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+D1d8Xs5tSb3EAriZ4C+kZTdA+fHtWo/GvZpUo VpLb/9BNbI8Iotmj3DBYtjeKXRmhz2LsMIidh6R+musR7WW5lA WQxh3ZcsO4AKV4IHqkKw== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > I'm not sure how often WIP commits become accidentally published or > left in the history, but perhaps it would be advantageous to provide > a means of specifying officially that a particular commit is in fact > a WIP commit such that no other commits can be made on top of this WIP > commit and it can't be merged with other branches or pushed or whatever. When will such blocking commits be useful? Would you really like to support a stopper or barrier for branches? Regards, Markus