From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's in a name? Let's use a (uuid,name,email) triplet
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:34:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA36F5F.9080706@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4087cc51003181457s76560b02y84aafbe77f45af87@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/18/2010 10:57 PM, Michael Witten wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 16:39, Martin Langhoff
> <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Michael Witten<mfwitten@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 16:19, Martin Langhoff
>>>> What's the value? For me it'll be "Martin Langhoff". I already have that.
>>>
>>> Well, that's rather egotistical considering you're probably not the
>>> only Martin Langhoff in this world. I'd advocate something like
>>> "Martin Langhoff<martin.langhoff@gmail.com>".
>>
>> So you are saying we should change the core datamodel of git to say...
>> what we already can say?
>
> You see, Martin, you might want/need to stop using "Martin Langhoff
> <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>" as your email account, but there's no
> reason why you can't continue to use it for your UUID.
While a gnu.org or gmail.com will (most likely) stay with some person
forever, hindsight is 20/20 and many people may generate his UUID from a
work email. So, suppose I make my UUID based on <pbonzini@redhat.com>
what will guarantee that in 20 years I won't find a new career as a
bartender, and Red Hat wouldn't hire someone with my same name, and give
him the same email address?
Heck, some people use gmail only for their personal email, and they
rightly cannot be bothered to create another account to solve a problem
they don't understand and they probably do not have.
For the UUID to make sense, it would need to be what the acronym says:
universally unique. An SHA-1 value is _not_ universally unique, it is
just a one-way function. There are tons of git repos out there with a
blob hashing to e69de29bb2d1d6434b8b29ae775ad8c2e48c5391 or
257cc5642cb1a054f08cc83f2d943e56fd3ebe99.
I have an idea. Start your own website uuidemail.com. One registers
and gets an alias for their email, something like
8aacc35ffca0d34fccf8a750e84e3a81bdcb940b@uuidemail.com. Then people can
start using
8aacc35ffca0d34fccf8a750e84e3a81bdcb940b+pbonzini--redhat.com@uuidemail.com
as their git user.email. I bet nobody will.
Paolo
ps: Yes, in a perfect world it would be nice for people to know that I
am the same person independent of whether I contribute as
bonzini@gnu.org or pbonzini@redhat.com. But we're not in a perfect
world, so amen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 13:23 What's in a name? Let's use a (uuid,name,email) triplet Michael Witten
2010-03-18 13:48 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-18 14:26 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-18 19:02 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-18 19:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-18 19:16 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-18 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-18 19:37 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-18 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-18 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-18 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-19 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-18 20:31 ` Reece Dunn
2010-03-18 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-18 19:32 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 19:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-18 19:47 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 19:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-18 20:00 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 19:52 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2010-03-18 19:40 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2010-03-18 19:42 ` Martin Langhoff
2010-03-18 22:36 ` Martin Langhoff
2010-03-18 23:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-18 23:26 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-18 23:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-18 23:41 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-18 23:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-19 0:16 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-19 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-19 0:39 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-19 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-19 1:12 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-19 1:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-19 2:05 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-18 23:34 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 18:42 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 18:47 ` Matthieu Moy
2010-03-18 18:57 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 19:12 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-18 20:44 ` tytso
2010-03-18 21:12 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 21:19 ` Martin Langhoff
2010-03-18 21:29 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 21:39 ` Martin Langhoff
2010-03-18 21:46 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 21:55 ` Martin Langhoff
2010-03-18 22:02 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 23:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-18 23:44 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 0:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-19 0:27 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 0:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-18 22:06 ` Reece Dunn
2010-03-18 21:57 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 12:34 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2010-03-19 12:43 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 12:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-03-19 13:03 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 13:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-03-19 13:13 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 13:41 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2010-03-19 13:59 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 14:13 ` Martin Langhoff
2010-03-18 21:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-18 21:44 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 23:12 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-18 22:17 ` A Large Angry SCM
2010-03-19 2:47 ` Sitaram Chamarty
2010-03-19 5:17 ` Nazri Ramliy
2010-03-19 8:41 ` Michael Haggerty
2010-03-19 11:39 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 11:45 ` david
2010-03-19 11:54 ` Mike Hommey
2010-03-19 12:09 ` Reece Dunn
2010-03-19 12:16 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 12:18 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 14:57 ` Reece Dunn
2010-03-19 15:26 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-03-19 16:05 ` david
2010-03-19 17:16 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 12:25 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-19 12:40 ` Reece Dunn
2010-03-19 12:09 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-22 12:06 ` Mark Brown
2010-03-22 14:38 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-24 19:18 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-03-24 19:23 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 12:08 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 14:08 ` Michael Haggerty
2010-03-19 17:02 ` david
2010-03-19 17:06 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-24 18:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-19 14:08 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-03-19 14:33 ` Jon Smirl
2010-03-19 14:52 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-03-19 14:40 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 14:56 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-03-19 15:05 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 15:12 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-19 15:25 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-03-19 15:12 ` Reece Dunn
2010-03-20 0:21 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA36F5F.9080706@gnu.org \
--to=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.langhoff@gmail.com \
--cc=mfwitten@gmail.com \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=win@wincent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).