From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: What's in a name? Let's use a (uuid,name,email) triplet Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:50:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4BAA5EF7.6000906@redhat.com> References: <4ba2293f.c5c2f10a.5e9c.5c4a@mx.google.com> <4BA338C1.7030803@alum.mit.edu> <4BA3855A.1070005@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: david@lang.hm, Michael Haggerty , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Witten X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 24 19:50:53 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NuVfF-000278-TX for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:50:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932685Ab0CXSuo (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:50:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40278 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932644Ab0CXSun (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:50:43 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2OIoY30007312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:50:34 -0400 Received: from firebolt.argo.co.il (vpn-6-86.tlv.redhat.com [10.35.6.86]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2OIoVgC008712; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:50:32 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.3 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 03/19/2010 07:06 PM, Michael Witten wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:02, wrote: > >> if you are now proposing using the e-mail address, that already exists and >> is supported by the tools, it sounds like you are just withdrawing your >> proposal (other than possibly proposing that the e-mail field gets renamed >> to UUID????) >> > You're responding to a different Michael. > I guess he should have checked the UUID. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.