From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mike.lifeguard" Subject: Re: Pseudonymous commits Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:00:39 -0300 Message-ID: <4BAAEDF7.1080107@gmail.com> References: <4BAADF34.3080806@gmail.com> <4BA51E6B-7325-465A-B23E-7F3C5BF87700@mit.edu> <4BAAE981.4040205@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Kris Shannon , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 25 06:01:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NufBq-0001eu-RV for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:01:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752016Ab0CYFBA (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:01:00 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:43824 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750842Ab0CYFA7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:00:59 -0400 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so668263vws.19 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:00:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KH7luuoUWIXN7uyWN9/1rozhSx+GLxcPZlhkgDHj+iU=; b=CrDDmzWKTG7S15CXylywtN5+3A5UGL4r1+5EpZabfaxL4uLFb7pTX7U1lZF4+Vatoe zc8yy1RT5uT+UGYiJak2YTB4WJB8m0eMREPleVFf+s9BjIcTcMbHU5tdxeU5A0fwb9IP TwAWQ0PGOt8YFjWuYyIfrcuXzGCIGnzGfou8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=qXkXUsN5ieU7nH5CDIxw1ky3CyqwYXBCOd9pKTVbQNVh+g9iyTu7uX+n6sR+pYG+6U rjTZ665fwr8Y27k7UU1wiY9IEDQ+MgKvdhqlyGQNA+9bluoraW9hqnoLXwlgxT6UotQf lsKrMEHeIr7CZ+4MAjOYt30fFWEQ21U6NPYKQ= Received: by 10.220.61.76 with SMTP id s12mr1920809vch.65.1269493258388; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:00:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([142.177.156.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 25sm13720367vws.9.2010.03.24.22.00.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:00:57 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090817 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10-03-25 01:54 AM, Kris Shannon wrote: > Accountability for translations is even more important because review is > usually a LOT harder. I didn't say the translations weren't reviewed, or the translators were unaccountable. They are in both cases. In any case, is the answer "git can't do that" or not? Because that's actually the answer I'm interested in. Thanks, - -Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuq7fcACgkQst0AR/DaKHvjLwCgxLt0Nf7a6u1s15hgtqOpAWAm mRcAoKnax9/54hbNXpGHlvMYRrwTj85C =4ele -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----