From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: Re: malformed threads when using both --in-reply-to and --compose with git send-email Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:12:57 -0400 Message-ID: <4BB206E9.8050807@xiplink.com> References: <1269902972.3392.42.camel@kheops> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: sylvain@abstraction.fr X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 30 16:13:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwcBu-0002Cr-7r for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:13:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755541Ab0C3ONI (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:13:08 -0400 Received: from smtp122.dfw.emailsrvr.com ([67.192.241.122]:47456 "EHLO smtp122.dfw.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752642Ab0C3ONG (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:13:06 -0400 Received: from relay12.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay12.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E80D52080258; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:13:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay12.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id 82D9F208018E; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:13:04 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) In-Reply-To: <1269902972.3392.42.camel@kheops> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sylvain Rabot wrote: > Hey, > > I don't know if it's the wanted behavior but It seemed odd to me. > > If I want to send a series of patches to an already started thread using > --in-reply-to option and --compose this is what I would get : > > git send-email --to git@vger.kernel.org --compose --in-reply-to #2> --format-patch HEAD~2 > > + Message #1 > + Message #2 > + [PATCH 0/2] My Serie of patches > + [PATCH 1/2] My first patch > + [PATCH 2/2] My second patch > > I would have expected something more like this which is done when > starting a new thread : > > + Message #1 > + Message #2 > + [PATCH 0/2] My Serie of patcher (In-Reply-To : ) > + [PATCH 1/2] My first patch (In-Reply-To : ) > + [PATCH 2/2] My second patch (In-Reply-To : patches>) I encountered this as well and agree with you that the latter would be better. --compose should only apply the --in-reply-to value to the composed message. Care to make a patch? M.